Moscow, under Washington's pressure, is prepared to retain only a small part of its gas transit through Ukraine.
The Ukrainian company in pursuit of 2.65 billion dollars from Gazprom barely has time to resume the arrest of shares of Nord Stream AG and Nord Stream 2 AG.
The assets of the Russian company in the UK are frozen to ensure the decision of the Stockholm Arbitration on the payment of "Naftogaz" 2.6 billion dollars.
For the construction of the "Nord Stream-2" is not enough just permission from Denmark.
After reports of the arrest of Gazprom's property in the Netherlands under the lawsuit of Naftogaz, the Russian company filed a lawsuit.
Following Switzerland, the Netherlands seized the assets of Gazprom in accordance with the decision of the Stockholm Arbitration, which obliges the Russian concern to pay Naftogaz $ 2.6 billion. However, neither the supply of gas to Europe from Russia, nor the construction of the "Nord Stream-2" is not yet threatened.
The court arrested the Dutch assets of Gazprom for paying Naftogaz 2.6 billion dollars on the decision of the Stockholm Arbitration, the Ukrainian company said.
In Europe, the seizure of Gazprom's assets began - in compliance with the decision of the Stockholm Arbitration, which ordered the concern to pay Ukrainian Naftogaz 2.6 billion dollars. Inventory of the property was held in Nord Stream 2 AG.
Kiev plans in this way to dislodge from the "Gazprom" argued in the Stockholm Arbitration 2,6 billion dollars.
Washington sees the project as a reconnaissance capability.
In relation to Gazprom and its partners in this country, an investigation has been launched.
Capacities and taxes compel the monopoly to increase debt.
Nord Stream 2 received the first permission to build a gas pipeline from Helsinki.
The money for "Nord Stream-2" attracts with the help of British debt agents.
"Gazprom" will have to negotiate with Ukraine on the transit and after the launch of the gas pipeline.
The former Federal Chancellor of Germany declined $ 500,000 per year for his work on the board of Rosneft.
The gas pipeline proved to be better than the analogues for unit costs.
Gazprom first disclosed the investments in the expansion of the UGSS for the project.